How Bancly Delivers Foresight

The Difference Between Knowing About the Future and Being Ready For It

Every bank scans the horizon. You read industry reports. You attend conferences. Your strategy team tracks fintech funding, regulatory proposals, technology trends.

But scanning isn’t foresight.

Foresight is the systematic practice of translating weak signals into strategic decisions – before uncertainty becomes crisis. It’s the discipline of seeing how forces interact, how futures diverge, and what choices today remain sound across multiple tomorrows.

This is what we’ve built over 13 years: a foresight methodology designed specifically for banking’s unique constraints.

No other firm does only this. No other firm has done it exclusively for financial institutions since 2012.

Here’s how we actually work.

---

The Bancly Foresight System: Six Methods, One Outcome

Most consultancies borrow foresight methods from other industries and adapt them to banking. We built ours from the ground up for banking’s specific complexity: capital requirements, regulatory relationships, legacy systems, fiduciary accountability, trust dynamics.

When you work with Bancly, you’re not learning to become a futurist. You’re accessing a system we’ve refined across 90+ engagements in 30+ countries.

1. Horizon Scanning – Your Early Warning System for Strategic Risk

What It Is: Systematic monitoring of signals across technology, regulation, economics, geopolitics, customer behavior, and competition—filtered specifically for what could impact your earnings, capital, risk profile, or competitive position.

What It’s Not: A firehose of articles and trend reports. We don’t send you everything. We send you what matters to your bank specifically.

How We Actually Do This:

We maintain proprietary intelligence streams across:

• Regulatory developments (Basel, IFRS, climate disclosure, AI governance, data privacy)
• Technology shifts (AI capabilities, cloud economics, cybersecurity, quantum computing, blockchain infrastructure)
• Competitive moves (fintech funding rounds, Big Tech financial services expansion, platform banking models)
• Macro dynamics (monetary policy, sovereign debt, trade flows, demographic shifts)
• Customer behavior (digital adoption, trust dynamics, generational preferences, embedded finance usage)

Then we filter these signals through your strategic context: your balance sheet structure, your market position, your regulatory environment, your capital constraints.

Real Example:

In Q4 2023, we flagged emerging language in the EU AI Act that would reclassify certain credit decisioning models as “high-risk AI systems.” This wasn’t front-page news yet. It was buried in draft legislative text.

We mapped the implications for three clients:

• 18-month compliance timeline once the regulation was finalized
• €2-5M implementation cost per institution
• Competitive advantage for banks that had already invested in explainable AI infrastructure
• Risk of being locked into legacy models if they waited for regulatory clarity

All three adjusted their AI roadmaps in Q1 2024—before the regulation was finalized in May 2024.

By the time competitors realized the implications, our clients had already built compliant infrastructure.

This is what horizon scanning delivers: early positioning advantage, not reactive compliance.

---

2. Trend Analysis – Separating Signal From Noise

What It Is: Understanding the structural drivers behind the signals—so you know which trends are accelerating, which are decelerating, and which are inflection points that will reshape banking economics.

What It’s Not: Extrapolating the past forward. Trends don’t move linearly. They compound, interact, and break at thresholds.

How We Actually Do This:

We analyze trends across multiple dimensions:

• Trajectory: Is this accelerating, plateauing, or reversing?
• Timeframe: Does this impact you in 12 months, 36 months, or 5+ years?
• Magnitude: Is this a 5% shift in margin or a 50% shift in business model?
• Dependency: What needs to happen for this trend to continue—or break?

Real Example:

In 2018, embedded finance was a buzzword. Fintechs were building “banking-as-a-service” infrastructure. But the question for our clients wasn’t “Is this real?” It was “When does this cross the tipping point—and what does that mean for our deposit base?”

We analyzed:

• Platform economics: When do digital platforms have incentive to embed financial services vs. partner with banks?
• Regulatory arbitrage: When do regulators close the gap between bank capital requirements and BaaS provider requirements?
• Customer behavior: When do customers trust non-banks with deposits?
• Technology maturity: When does API infrastructure make embedded finance truly scalable?

The analysis revealed a 3-5 year timeline to meaningful impact—but with a critical threshold: once 15-20% of retail customers held material balances in embedded accounts, deposit stickiness would fundamentally change.

One client—a $60B retail bank—used this analysis to reshape their deposit strategy. Instead of defending branch-gathered deposits, they built API infrastructure to become the embedded banking provider for regional platforms.

By 2022, they had wholesale deposit relationships with e-commerce and SaaS platforms their retail competitors were losing deposits to.

Trend analysis told them not just what was coming, but when to move—and how.

---

3. Scenario Planning – Stress-Testing Strategy Against Multiple Futures

What It Is: Building 3-5 plausible futures (not forecasts) that capture key uncertainties, then testing your current strategy against each one to see where it holds—and where it breaks.

What It’s Not: “Best case, base case, worst case” planning. That’s sensitivity analysis. Scenarios explore structural divergence, not magnitude variance.

How We Actually Do This:

We identify the two most critical uncertainties facing your institution—uncertainties where the outcome genuinely could go multiple ways—then build a scenario matrix.

For a recent client (a $120B North American bank facing digital disruption), the two uncertainties were:

• Customer preference: Do customers value integrated relationships or best-of-breed point solutions?
• Regulatory stance: Do regulators maintain bank-centric frameworks or enable platform competition?

This created four distinct futures:

1. Protected Primacy – Customers value relationships, regulators favor banks
2. Defended Territory – Customers fragment, but regulators protect banks
3. Relationship Renaissance – Customers value integration, but platforms can compete
4. Platform Takeover – Customers fragment, platforms can compete freely

We then stress-tested their strategy (a $300M digital banking investment) against all four:

• In Scenario 1: Investment pays off, strong ROI
• In Scenario 2: Investment underperforms, but defensible
• In Scenario 3: Investment pays off if repositioned around trust/privacy
• In Scenario 4: Investment fails, platform economics win

The insight: Their strategy was robust in three of four futures—if they repositioned from convenience to trust. In one future, no amount of investment would preserve their model.

This didn’t tell them what to do. It showed them which strategic bets had broad resilience and which were single-future gambles.

They proceeded with the investment, but reframed the entire value proposition around financial health and privacy—not speed and features.

Scenarios don’t predict. They prepare.

---

4. Cross-Impact Analysis – Seeing the Interactions That Break Models

What It Is: Mapping how different forces interact—because bank failures rarely come from single shocks. They come from cascading effects and second-order impacts.

What It’s Not: Risk correlation matrices. Cross-impact analysis explores non-linear interactions that traditional risk models miss.

How We Actually Do This:

We map how changes in one domain cascade into others:

Example: EU AI Act Regulation (mapped for a European bank in 2023)

• Primary impact: Compliance cost, model governance overhead
• Secondary impacts:
  • Slowed AI deployment → delayed cost reduction → extended timeline to target cost-income ratio
  • Explainability requirements → advantage to banks with better data infrastructure → competitive divergence
  • “High-risk” classification → reputational risk if publicized → customer trust dynamics
  • Regulatory scrutiny → board accountability → governance resource reallocation
  • Vendor dependencies → third-party risk concentration → operational resilience gaps

The bank was planning to invest €15M in AI credit models. Cross-impact analysis revealed they needed to invest an additional €4M in governance infrastructure, data lineage tools, and board reporting—or the AI investment would create more risk than value.

They adjusted the business case, secured the additional budget, and deployed successfully. Competitors who didn’t account for cross-impacts are now retrofitting governance at 2x the cost.

Cross-impact analysis uncovers the hidden costs and compounding risks your financial models don’t capture.

---

5. Backcasting – Building a Bank That Wins in Multiple Futures

What It Is: Instead of forecasting forward, you define a desired future state (e.g., ROE > 14%, cost-income < 40%, AI-native operations, climate-resilient portfolio), then work backward to determine what must be true today to reach it.

What It’s Not: Strategic planning. Strategic planning starts with today and projects forward. Backcasting starts with tomorrow and works backward—revealing the choices you need to make now that long-range forecasts can’t show you.

How We Actually Do This:

We work with executive teams to define success across multiple scenarios, then reverse-engineer the pathway:

Example: A Middle Eastern bank wanted to be “the regional leader in digital banking” by 2028.

We asked: What does that actually mean in different futures?

• In a platform-dominated future: Leadership means being the embedded provider of choice
• In a relationship-centric future: Leadership means owning the primary customer relationship
• In a regulatory-fragmented future: Leadership means having licenses and partnerships across borders
• In a climate-constrained future: Leadership means having the lowest-carbon banking model

Then we backcast from each future:

• 2028 target state → What capabilities must exist by 2027? → What investments by 2026? → What decisions by 2025?

The analysis revealed that “digital leadership” required fundamentally different strategies depending on which future arrived. But one pattern emerged: in all futures, API infrastructure, data platform capability, and partnership ecosystems were table stakes.

They stopped debating which digital investments to make and started building the foundational layer that worked across all scenarios.

Backcasting turns vision into execution roadmap—without betting on a single future.

---

6. Futures Wheel – Mapping Ripple Effects Leadership Can’t Afford to Miss

What It Is: A structured method for uncovering the second-, third-, and fourth-order consequences of a single change—so you see impacts that aren’t obvious until it’s too late.

What It’s Not: Brainstorming or speculation. Futures Wheel follows a disciplined process of asking “What happens next?” at each layer, validated by evidence and logic.

How We Actually Do This:

We start with a single event or trend, then systematically map its consequences:

Example: “Instant payment infrastructure becomes ubiquitous” (mapped for a Southeast Asian bank in 2020)

First-order effects:

• Transaction speed increases
• Customer expectations shift
• Float income disappears

Second-order effects:

• NIM compression accelerates
• Branch traffic declines further
• Cross-border remittance pools shrink
• Treasury business model changes

Third-order effects:

• Banks compete on services, not transactions
• Fee income models restructure
• Partnerships with platforms become strategic necessity
• Capital deployment shifts from branches to digital infrastructure

Fourth-order effects:

• Competitive consolidation accelerates (small banks can’t afford infrastructure investment)
• Regulatory scrutiny on platform partnerships increases
• Data becomes the primary competitive asset
• Bank valuation multiples compress for transaction-dependent models

The client was planning to invest $40M in branch upgrades. Futures Wheel analysis showed that in a world of instant payments, branches weren’t just less relevant—they were strategically misaligned with where customer value was moving.

They redirected $25M of that capital to API infrastructure and partnership development. Three years later, their partnership-driven fee income grew 45% while branch-generated revenue declined 30%.

Futures Wheel doesn’t predict the future. It reveals which decisions remain sound when second-order effects compound.

---

What Makes Bancly’s Methodology Different

1. It’s built exclusively for banking’s constraints

We understand capital requirements, regulatory relationships, legacy system dependencies, fiduciary accountability, and trust dynamics. Generic foresight methods don’t account for these—ours do.

2. It’s designed for board-level governance, not innovation labs

Our outputs aren’t “future of banking” white papers. They’re decision frameworks that link what’s changing externally to the KPIs leadership is accountable for internally.

3. It’s proven across 90+ engagements in 30+ countries

Since 2012, we’ve refined these methods with retail banks, central banks, regulators, development finance institutions, and banking associations. Every engagement makes the methodology sharper.

4. It’s delivered by people who’ve lived inside the complexity

Our team isn’t consultants who learned foresight from books. We’re former bankers, policy advisors, and risk officers who’ve sat in executive committees, defended capital plans, and governed through uncertainty.

---

How This Translates Into Your Engagements

When you work with Bancly, you don’t get a generic methodology applied to your bank.

You get a bespoke foresight process that:

• Starts with your specific strategic tensions (not industry-generic questions)
• Uses the methods most relevant to your decisions (not all six just because we have them)
• Delivers outputs your board and ExCo can actually use (not academic reports)
• Builds capability your team can sustain (not dependence on external consultants)

Our three core offerings apply this methodology differently:

• The Executive Reframe uses Horizon Scanning, Scenario Planning, and Backcasting to answer immediate strategic decisions
• The Board Foresight Mandate applies all six methods in a continuous quarterly rhythm for ongoing governance
• The Foresight Engine embeds these methods into your organization so your team builds the capability internally

---

The Bottom Line

You don’t need to learn how to do foresight. You need foresight to work for your institution.

We’ve spent 13 years building a methodology that translates structural uncertainty into strategic clarity. You focus on running your bank. We focus on helping you see farther and decide better.

Ready to see how this applies to your specific challenges?

---

Bancly. Strategic foresight for banking leadership.